Contract Review.
Contract Review reads every inbound agreement end to end — before anyone signs in a hurry. It compares each clause against your playbook, flags the non-standard terms with severity and the reason they matter, and drafts redline language ready for your attorney to approve, modify, or reject. The lawyer stays the lawyer; the bot does the reading.
Every page read. Every deviation flagged.
- Intake. Contracts arrive at the legal-intake mailbox — subcontracts, NDAs, MSAs, vendor terms. The bot opens a review file for each.
- Read end to end. Every clause, exhibit, and definition — including page 14, where the painful terms like to live.
- Compare to playbook. Each term is checked against your standards: indemnification, payment terms, termination, liability caps, insurance requirements.
- Flag with severity. Deviations are ranked — high, medium, low — with the clause quoted, the standard cited, and why the gap matters in plain language.
- Draft redlines. For each flag, proposed replacement language in tracked-changes form — ready for the attorney to approve, edit, or strike.
- Lawyer signs. Nothing leaves without counsel's approval. The bot assembles the approved redline package and sends it back, audit trail complete.
Watch a real exchange.
A GC's 22-page subcontract hits legal intake. Watch the bot flag three non-standard terms with severity — and the attorney approve two redlines and modify one.
The value proposition.
Nothing signed unread
The 22-page subcontract gets fully read in minutes, not skimmed at 6 PM before a deadline. Page-14 surprises stop reaching the signature line.
Your playbook, enforced
Indemnification, pay-when-paid, liability caps — your standards are applied to every contract identically, not from memory.
Counsel hours spent on judgment
The attorney reviews flagged deviations with draft language ready — billable reading time becomes minutes of decision time.
A defensible trail
What was flagged, what was waived, who approved what, when — if a clause ever bites, you can show exactly how it was reviewed.